• About the Author
  • About the Site Name
  • Consulting Services
  • What readers are saying

Better fat than fascist

~ Considerations into the failures of over goverance & the successes of freedom

Monthly Archives: October 2014

Nov. 4 Forecast: Rainy and Windy With A Chance of 54 GOP Senators

28 Tuesday Oct 2014

Posted by BetterFatThanFascist.com in 2014 Election, 52, 53, 54, Democrats, GOP, Republicans, runoff, weather

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2014 election, 52, 53, 54, Democrats, GOP, Mark Begich, Republicans, runoff, Senate, weather

By Greg Smith

Ironically, Republicans should be hoping Al Gore was right about global warming. If the year’s sluggish cyclone season cooks up a storm for Nov. 4, a small hurricane Hanna or Isaias could possibly mean 54 Republican senators.

The Southeast, from Texas to Virginia, has 13 Senate races including five considered toss-ups in Kentucky, North Carolina, Georgia, Arkansas and Louisiana. The election projections on RealClearPolitics.com on the 27 races considered leaning or solid toward either party appear to be on target, and these show the GOP with 45 likely seats, Democrats with 45, and 10 races that are statistically tied.

Of the 10 considered statistically even, seven are currently seats held by Democrats, and two of those look like certain GOP wins.

In Alaska, Republican challenger Dan Sullivan has been leading incumbent Democrat Sen. Mark Begich in the polls for two months. Begich would have a fighting chance in any other election, but he doesn’t have much in the way of accomplishments and is heading into a gale force wind that is President Obama’s unpopularity. In 2008 Begich managed to win by just 1.2 percentage points over an incumbent just convicted on corruption charges, the now deceased Sen. Ted Stevens. And of Alaskans who voted for a presidential candidate in 2008, 2.3 percent didn’t bother to vote for a Senate candidate, meaning if all the votes for the Republican presidential candidate had translated into a vote for Stevens, he still would have won. Alaska should be a GOP slam dunk.

In Louisiana, Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu is facing two Republicans in what amounts to a primary. Polls have her at about 40 percent, with neither GOP opponent anywhere near 50 percent. If no candidate receives 50 percent of the vote, a runoff between the top two would take place Dec. 6. Polls have Landrieu handily losing the likely runoff.

And in Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell has consistently led Democratic challenger Alison Grimes slightly in the polls and would likely be Senate majority leader in the event of a Republican Senate takeover. Kentuckians, who for years watched Sen. Robert Byrd of neighboring West Virginia turn the federal budget into an ATM for his state, are not going to throw that kind of political clout away. Just last year McConnell got a $3 billion earmark for a dam in Kentucky. It was a taste of things to come. Barring some major snafu, McConnell wins this race going away.

Of the other seven races considered a toss up, only New Hampshire seems a likely Democratic victory. Colorado Republican challenger Cory Gardner is slightly up in the polls against incumbent Democrat Sen. Mark Udall. Sen. Pat Roberts, Kansas Republican, has brought his poll numbers back from under 40 percent to just about tie with independent challenger Greg Orman. Orman’s poll numbers have been very consistent, but have dropped off very slightly. According to polls this race is considered a toss-up, but I seriously doubt on Election Day deeply Republican Kansas would possibly deny the GOP a majority in the Senate.

In Iowa, Republican Joni Ernst has consistently led Democrat Bruce Braley for the open seat being vacated by five-term Democrat Tom Harkin, as has Republican challenger Mark Cotton led Democratic Sen. Mark Pryor in Arkansas.

Only Georgia and North Carolina have had the Democrats slightly ahead in polls. In North Carolina, Democratic incumbent Kay Hagan has been ahead of Republican challenger Thom Tillis by about two percentage points while Libertarian candidate Sean Haugh is polling over five percent. Libertarians generally pull more votes from Republicans, and voters generally don’t like to vote for candidates who have no chance at winning. If Haugh supporters abandon him in the voting booth because it is such a close race, that could push Tillis over the top.

Democrat Michelle Nunn and Republican David Purdue running for the seat of retiring Georgia Sen. Saxby Chambliss are in a dead heat. As in Louisiana, if neither candidate gets 50 percent, the two candidates with the most votes will have a runoff Jan. 6, 2015. Libertarian candidate Amanda Swafford is polling four percent. If the election looks razor thin, Swafford supporters will have an incentive to vote for one of the major candidates, which at least won’t hurt Purdue, though he will be better off if a runoff is needed.

The likelihood of no candidate winning either Georgia or Louisiana on Election Day also helps Republicans, as they are more likely to go to the polls for special elections.

These closest races will decide who controls the Senate, and these races will be decided by voter turnout. Turnout is projected to be quite low, and a Gallup forecast shows Republicans hold a massive edge over Democrats in voter motivation and enthusiasm, similar to the advantages they held in 2010 when the GOP picked up 63 seats in the House.

Consider Colorado. Incumbent Democrat Mark Udall last year moved in favor of further gun control, while challenger Cory Gardner is pro-gun rights. Second Amendment advocates will eat bacon and wear fur while crawling through a PETA rally to vote, and the network that helped recall two pro-gun control state senators and forced another to resign last year will be working to get voters to the polls. Low turnout will be a huge benefit to Gardner, as it should be to every other Republican.

As the races now stand any major weather event – even just a cold snap — that covers a decent portion of the country should further impinge voter turnout and seal 53 seats for the GOP. A day of heavy rain could allow the GOP to take nine of the 10 close races.

While not quite probable, 54 Republican Senate seats is very possible —  and rather interesting. In any case, Republicans need 52 seats to prevent losing the Senate to a party switch. Considering its advantages at this point, anything less than 52 should be considered a disappointment.   ©

Greg Smith is a freelance writer and political consultant who lives in Bantam, CT. His blog is found at www.betterfatthanfascist.com.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2014/senate/2014_elections_senate_map.html

http://www.gallup.com/poll/178130/voter-engagement-lower-2010-2006-midterms.aspx

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Coming China Bust is Pre-Ordained by History

18 Saturday Oct 2014

Posted by BetterFatThanFascist.com in aging, apogee, bears, bullish, bulls, bureaucracy, business cycle, China, Corruption, credit crisis, dot-com, Fannie, Freddie, Japan, Malthus, Malthusian, misallocation, mixed, One-Child Policy, one-party, reform, short-term, speculation, Stalin, yuan

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

aging, apogee, bears, bullish, bulls, bureaucracy, business cycle, China, corruption, credit crisis, dot-com, Fannie, Freddie, Japan, Malthus, Malthusian, misallocation, mixed, One-Child Policy, one-party, reform, short-term, speculation, Stalin, yuan

“Them smokestacks reachin’ like the arms of God, into a beautiful sky of soot and clay;
Here in Youngstown, here in Youngstown;
Sweet Jenny I’m sinkin’ down, Here darlin’ in Youngstown.” – Bruce Springsteen, “Youngstown”

By Greg Smith

Prophesizing China’s economic future does not require an MBA, CPA, or a lifetime subscription to WSJ.com. A search of the web turns up economic predictions that cite every manner of economic indicators but usually ignore the most accurate set of statistics: history.

In 1999 Americans were making huge paper returns from Internet start-up companies that were hemorrhaging borrowed money. Dot-coms were forecasting enormous losses into the future with little or no concern for turning a profit, focusing instead on market share. Investment capital went into massive ad budgets and the trappings of success as twenty-somethings mocked profit warnings from middle-aged accountants and the notion there could be any problem with this new paradigm of business.

By 2002 over $5 trillion in paper wealth had been wiped out when these dot-coms failed en masse. For perspective, U.S. gross domestic product in 2002 was $10.5 trillion. Had the dot-coms been human, coroners would have assumed it was the work of a serial killer because the post mortems of each generally shared one attribute of the deceased: ‘They tried to do too much too soon.’ This will be the epitaph of the Chinese economic miracle.

The huge number of predictions on China’s economic future run the spectrum from bullish to downright Malthusian, but these cite recent financials, which shouldn’t even be needed. No, China’s economic future was set in jade when it its reformist leaders decided in the 1970s they wanted the advantages of a market economy while keeping control over the economy. You can have one, you can have the other. You can’t have both.

The history of the mixed economy, which China’s is because of government control of credit and lending, heavy corruption and PLA involvement, is too well documented for anyone to believe China has somehow found a way to manage its financial system better than the market. Government cannot manage a lending system without a bureaucracy. Bureaucracy is a very powerful tool for maintaining minimum management standards, but it cannot rise to the level of quality in a free market, government will always end up too concerned with short-term objectives and political goals will take precedence over innovation and best business practices, causing massive misallocation of resources. The top-down model cannot adequately follow and understand the enormous changes in technology that will change global commerce in the next three decades.

How do I square this opinion with China’s enormous growth? Easy. The growth of the last three decades is due to the free market reforms, the benefits of which always kick in quickly. Business faces fewer impediments in China than in the U.S. Coca-Cola CEO Muhtar Kent said in 2011 China has a better business climate than the U.S. With a constant drive for new regulations and to place more social responsibilities on businesses, it is no mystery why commerce in the U.S. is at a comparative disadvantage.

On the other hand, as Japan’s economy showed in the 1980s, problems caused by politicized lending practices do not rear their ugly head overnight. They often take decades to come to fruition, snowballing into a massive drag on the economy. China is now facing a serious real estate bubble because after 2008 government policy flooded China’s economy with cheap credit, fueling a boom in speculative building based on assumptions that buyers would eventually appear.

Someone may point to the mortgage crisis in the U.S. to say the market is itself quite fallible. While lending is a far more decentralized, private function in the U.S. economy, the U.S. credit crisis was also a product of politicized lending and social engineering. Since 1970 government-sponsored corporations Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have bought up mortgages from private lenders, allowing the lenders to put the funds back into new mortgages. Lenders could make loans without regard to property value or ability to repay, take their profits and sell the loan to Fannie or Freddie. Why was anyone surprised they actually did so?

Over the years the two mortgage giants also faced increased requirements to invest in affordable housing, which forced lending institutions to lend to lower income people who were less financially able to handle home ownership. Lenders also faced new anti-discrimination laws that made it easy for them to get sued or fined if they didn’t give out enough mortgages to this or that minority group, resulting in even more bad loans.

Had Fannie and Freddie not been government backed, the U.S. housing crisis would have never happened. Mortgage lenders would have been on the hook for bad loans they made, forcing them to rely on quality analysis based on facts, not happy thoughts and good intentions. Lenin once predicted, “The capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them.” As well, lenders would have gladly lent to minorities who were in a position to put down some money and make their mortgage payments.

There are ample signs of economic slowdown in China, which is a normal part of the business cycle. The question is whether Beijing’s economy will pick back up again and continue to outperform Western economies to become the world’s largest, or has heavy government involvement exchanged quick GDP growth for long-term economic vitality and China will soon be the new Japan.

When government is involved in an economy its first goal usually is to create jobs. Creating jobs is easy. Stalin created millions of them. Jobs created by government inducement or edict create less wealth than those created independently, as the latter must stand on economic usefulness while the former cause huge misallocation of resources. If the jobs were that important to the economy, they would have already existed. As with America’s housing crisis, government involvement is what caused China’s real estate bubble that now has markets worried.

If China’s economy was built on such strong foundations, it should not have needed such a massive infusion of liquidity since 2008. Beijing’s economic gurus want greater domestic consumption, and a drop in Western demand for goods would have been a perfect time to tempt consumers with lower-priced goods. China bulls often celebrate Beijing’s one-party-rule ability to implement policy ‘on a dime’ so it certainly could have guided investment toward domestic consumption. Instead, to ensure social stability money flowed into infrastructure projects – which functioned as jobs programs — that were not needed.

China’s only hope at sustained growth is increasing domestic consumption, difficult to achieve when government-provided social security exists largely just on paper, and the One-Child Policy has left a rapidly aging population — in 15 years China will have just two workers for every person over 60 — less willing to spend on non-necessities the yuan they will need in old age.

Without dependable investment options, another cause of China’s real estate bubble, what money they can save will be eaten into by China’s somewhat high inflation.

The Middle Kingdom cannot continue to grow economically without major political reforms, which the Communist Party is not going to allow. Developing economies under dictatorial regimes can easily increase economic output. They falter in transition to mature economies that require social and political freedoms which help drive innovation and progress. Today, China is at that critical juncture and shows no signs of democratizing in any meaningful way. China’s economy, and with it Beijing’s power, is nearing its apogee and will soon be in relative decline.

I do not claim to be an expert on China’s economy. Even if I were such an expert, if individuals could truly understand something as massive and complicated as a national economy, then command economies could work and have long-term advantages over messy free markets.

History on the other hand is much easier to understand. Past economic experiences unambiguously show statist economies hit a brick wall before they are able to mature. Over the long haul free-market economies always outperform mixed economies because government involvement introduces many more non-economic decisions. Just as dot-com investors discovered, China will learn when something seems too good to be true, it usually is.

So in conclusion the Chinese are, as are the rest of us, better fat than fascist.   ©

Greg Smith is a freelance writer and political consultant who lives in Bantam, CT. His blog is found at www.betterfatthanfascist.com.

 

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

N. Korean Leader Hurts Leg, Blames Kringle

09 Thursday Oct 2014

Posted by BetterFatThanFascist.com in Kim, Kringle

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Kim, Kringle, leg, North Korea

KimMeisterburger

“No more toys!”

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/10/09/us-northkorea-kim-idUSKCN0HY09T20141009

http://www.acartoonchristmas.com/2009/12/15/dec-15-santa-claus-is-comin-to-town/

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 33 other followers

Donate

Archives

  • January 2017
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • June 2015
  • February 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014

Like us on Facebook

Like us on Facebook

Tags

China Crimea Democrats GOP NATO naval blockade Obama Republicans Russia Ukraine

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • Better fat than fascist
    • Join 33 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Better fat than fascist
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: